There’s been lots of tweeting about this Ravishly interview with Kathleen Gilles Seidel today, and I said it would be a great topic for further discussion on a blog post, so of course I found myself volunteering to write one that could be a place for discussion.
First Things First
I am not interested in discussing the interviewer or the interviewer’s place in romance criticism in this space. I have not named the interviewer because I am hoping to avoid having that take over the conversation. I also find the name tends to act as a bat signal and then that person arrives and shapes the subsequent discussion and no thank you.
If I have any bias here, it’s that I adored Again and plan to read more of Seidel’s work.
The Parts that Interested Me Most
(and I think I’m not alone) were Seidel’s comments on her relationship to her audience.
View original post 798 more words
mharvey816 